Latest News

Saturday December 23 2017
By Rob van Zeijst
AlphaGo Presentation Review
Thursday December 21 2017
By Kim Ouweleen
Dutch Go Championships 2018
Friday December 1 2017
By Kim Ouweleen
16 December: AlphaGo screening & discussion
Wednesday November 15 2017
By Kim Ouweleen
Exhibition of Ikebana & Shodō - 28 and 29 October
Friday November 10 2017
By Kim Ouweleen
Seong-jin Kim 8d dominates Anniversary Go Tournament
Tuesday October 31 2017
By Kim Ouweleen
Celebratory Anniversary Reception
Saturday October 28 2017
By Kim Ouweleen
Japan Festival 2017
Thursday October 12 2017
By Kim Ouweleen
Teachers' Day on October 20th
Thursday October 5 2017
By Kim Ouweleen
Cleaning of all Go Material!
Wednesday September 20 2017
By Kim Ouweleen
25 Years EGCC Anniversary Go Tournament - 21 and 22 October

Check out the Full News Listing.

Criteria for judging projects

Stones world wide

Open international contest of go promotional projects

Criteria for judging projects

Effectivity

  • Are there measurable objectives?
  • Are the objectives reached?
  • Are the goals relevant?

Several basic categories of objectives could be distinguished, such as:

  • Increasing public awareness,
  • Strengthening existing Go communities,
  • Supporting the organization of Go promotion itself.

Efficiency

  • What is the ratio between human and financial input on the one hand and the outcome on the other?

Originality

  • Is the project unique in its nature?
  • Does the project open new perspectives for the promotion of Go?

Actuality

  • Does the project make use of new opportunities, social developments, (marketing) strategies, technologies, social media?

Potentiality

  • Is further development of the project promising?

Replicability

  • Is the project a good example to follow in similar circumstances at other places?

Simplicity

  • Is the project highly independent of specific capacities or knowledge of the person(s) needed to run it?

Replaceability

  • If apparent alternatives already exist for the methods or materials used, how are the differences evaluated?

Attractivity

  • How is the project presented in external relationships (partners)?
  • Can the presentation appeal to the target audience?

Quality

  • If the project involves go-technical content of its own, what is the value of it?
ABOUT US
CONTACT ABOUT US
SOCIAL
facebook twitter
NEWS
NEWS ARCHIVE
MANAGEMENT
Login